Preview

Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies

Advanced search

What problem and how does the spiking deconvolution algorithm solve

https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2025-1-23

Abstract

Some aspects of seismic deconvolution are considered. It is shown that the traditional justification of spiking deconvolution is correct only for a minimum-phase wavelet. For a mixed-phase and band-limited wavelet deconvolution solves the problem of expanding the amplitude spectrum within the signal frequency band, and this is achieved by means of autoregressive spectrum estimation.

About the Author

M. S. Denisov
GEOLAB Ltd
Russian Federation

Mikhail S. Denisov
Ordzhonikidze Str., 12/4, Moscow, 119071



References

1. Altshuler S.V., Lapan A.B., Finikov D.B. Parametric methods of spectrum estimation in seismic exploration (InRuss.). VIEMS, Moscow, 1986. 48 p.

2. Berkhout A.J. Related properties of minimum‐phase and zero‐phase time functions // Geophysical Prospecting.

3. Vol. 22 (4). P. 683–709. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1974.tb00111.x.

4. Boganik G.N., Gurvich I.I. Seismic exploration (In Russ.). AIS, Tver, 2006. 744 p.

5. Box G.E.P., Jenkins G.M. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-day, San Francisco, Cambridge, London, Amsterdam, 1970.

6. Denisov M.S. Two-sided autoregressive model of a seismic trace // Geofizika. 1994. No. 3. P. 2–12. (In Russ.). EDN:TIHPVT.

7. Denisov M.S. How to interpret the prediction deconvolution algorithm // Geofizika. 1995. No. 3. P. 44–48. (In Russ.). EDN:TJIYIB.

8. Denisov M.S., Finikov D.B. A method for seismic wavelet amplitude spectrum estimation and the algorithm of "amplitude deconvolution" // Geofizika. 1997. No. 2. P. 17–23. (In Russ.). EDN:TNKYRB.

9. Fink L.M. Signals, noise, errors …. (In Russ.). Radio and Communication, Moscow, 1984. 256 p.

10. Gogonenkov G.N. Study of the detailed structure of sedimentary strata by seismic exploration (In Russ.). Nedra, Moscow, 1987. 222 p.

11. Goldin S.V. Linear transformations of seismic signals (In Russ.). Nedra, Moscow, 1974. 352 p.

12. Harkevich A.A. Spectra and analysis (In Russ.). LIBROKOM, Moscow, 2009, 236 p.

13. Hurgin Ya.I., Yakovlev V.P. Finite functions in physics and technics (In Russ.). Nauka, Moscow, 1971. 408 p.

14. Kay S.M., Marple S.L. Spectrum analysis – A modern perspective // Proceeding of the IEEE. 1981. Vol. 69 (11). P. 1380–1419. doi:10.1109/PROC.1981.12184.

15. Kireeva A.P., Finikov D.B. AGC and deconvolution. Wavelet shape distortions during nonlinear transformations // Instruments and Systems of Exploration Geophysics. 2025. No. 1 (84). P. 87–103. (In Russ.). EDN:ZBRTAG.

16. Kozlov E.A., Gogonenkov G.N., Lerner B.L., Mushin I.A., Meshbey V.I., Klimovich N.I., Yankovkij I.I. Digital processing of seismic data (In Russ.). Nedra, Moscow, 1973. 309 p.

17. Levin B.R. Theoretical fundamentals of statistical radio engineering (In Russ.). Radio and communication, Moscow, 1989. 654 p.

18. Li G.F., Zhou H., Zhao C. Potential risks of spectrum whitening deconvolution – compared with well-driven deconvolution // Petroleum Science. 2009. Vol. 6 (2). P. 146–152. doi:10.1007/s12182-009-0023-y.

19. Ljung L. System identification: Theory for the user. Prentice-Hall, 1999. 609 p.

20. Marple S.L., Jr. Digital spectral analysis with applications. Prentice-Hall, 1987. 495 p.

21. Mitchell A.R., Stokes W.D. Sampling and minimum phase from both a continuous and discrete point of view // Geophysical Prospecting. 1986. Vol. 34 (6). P. 807–821. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00494.x.

22. Nikitin A.A. Theoretical foundations of geophysical information processing (In Russ.). Nedra, Moscow, 1986. 342 p.

23. Peacock K.L., Treitel S. Predictive deconvolution: theory and practice // Geophysics. 1969. Vol. 34 (2). P. 155–169. doi:10.1190/1.1440003.

24. Rapoport M.B. Computing technologies in field geophysics (In Russ.). Nedra, Moscow, 1993. 352 p.

25. Robinson E.A. Predictive decomposition of seismic traces // Geophysics. 1957. Vol. 22 (4). P. 767–778. doi:10.1190/1.1438415.

26. Robinson E.A. Statistical pulse compression // Proceeding of the IEEE. 1984. Vol. 72 (10). P. 1276–1289. doi:10.1109/PROC.1984.13017.

27. Robinson E., Treitel S. Digital signal processing in geophysics // Application of digital signal processing (In Russ.) Mir, Moscow, 1980. P. 486–544.

28. Robinson E.A., Treitel S. Digital imaging and deconvolution: The ABCs of seismic exploration and processing. SEG, Tulsa, 2008. 424 p. doi:10.1190/1.9781560801610.

29. Sheriff R.E., Geldart L.P. Exploration seismology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 592 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139168359.

30. Sylvia M.T., Robinson E.A. Deconvolution of geophysical time series in the exploration for oil and natural gas. Elsevier Science, 1979. 252 p.

31. Tribolet J. Applications of short-time homomorphic signal analysis to seismic wavelet estimation // Geoexploration. 1978. Vol. 16 (1–2). P. 75–96. doi:10.1016/0016-7142(78)90008-X.

32. Varakin L.E. Theory of complex signals (In Russ.). Soviet Radio, Moscow, 1970. 376 p.

33. Vasilenko G.I., Taratorin А.М. Reconstruction of images (In Russ.). Radio and communication, Moscow, 1986. 302 p.

34. Yilmaz Ö. Seismic data analysis. SEG, Tulsa, 2001. Vol. 1. 1809 p.


Review

For citations:


Denisov M.S. What problem and how does the spiking deconvolution algorithm solve. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies. 2025;(1):23-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2025-1-23

Views: 36


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2619-1563 (Online)