Testing the matrix implementation of the algorithm for surface-consistent compensation of seismic amplitudes
https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2021-4-26
Abstract
This paper tests and evaluates the algorithm for surface-consistent compensation of seismic amplitudes. The algorithm is based on factorial decomposition and is implemented in matrix form. The matrix view links all seismic observations to accurately identify variations associated with discontinuities in the upper section. The algorithm was tested on synthetic data containing about 10.5 million observations. Testing shows the possibility of applying the method to large amounts of data with high accuracy.
About the Authors
R. S. Kushnarev
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
N. A. Goreiavchev
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
G. M. Mitrofanov
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
References
1. Bohlen T., De Nil D., Köhn D., Jetschny S. SOFI3D-seismic modeling with finite differences 3D-acoustic and viscoelastic version: Users guide. – KIT, Karlsrue, 2012.
2. Booker A.H., Linville A.F., Wason C.B. Long wavelength static estimation // Geophysics. – 1976. – Vol. 41 (5). – P. 939–959, doi: 10.1190/1.1440673.
3. Davletkhanov R.T. Correction of seismic records for the influence of the upper part of the section with the preservation of the kinematics of reflected waves corresponding to the reservoir model of the medium. PhD Thes. [in Russian]. – MSU, Moscow, 2017.
4. Fourier J.B.J. Théorie analytique de la chaleur. – Firmin Didot, 1822.
5. Glogovsky V.M., Khachatryan A.R. Correction of static corrections in CDP seismic exploration for oil and gas [in Russian]. – VNIIOENG, Moscow, 1986.
6. Goldin S.V., Mitrofanov G.M. Reconstruction of the signal shape in the presence of surface inhomogeneities. // Seismic methods of prospecting and exploration of minerals [in Russian]. – Znanie, Kiev, 1973. – P. 6–8.
7. Goldin S.V., Mitrofanov G.M. Spectral-statistical method for accounting for surface inhomogeneities in systems for multiple tracking of reflected waves // Soviet Geology and Geophysics. – 1975. – No. 6. – P. 102–112.
8. Gurvich I.I. On the theoretical foundations of dynamic measurements in seismic exploration. Izvestiya Vuzov. Geologiya i Razvedka. – 1970. – No. 6. – P. 108–113.
9. Mitrofanov G.M. Accounting for surface inhomogeneities in the CDP method // Abstracts of the X scientific student conference (Geology. Geophysics. Geochemistry). – NSU, Novosibirsk, 1972. – P. 44–45.
10. Mitrofanov G.M. Joint estimation of linear factors in CDP observation systems // Application of methods of computational mathematics and mathematical statistics in digital processing of seismic survey data. – IGiG, Novosibirsk, 1975. – P. 166–186.
11. Sergienko A.B. Digital signal processing [in Russian]. – BHV-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, 2011.
12. Sysoev A.P. Applied problems of compensating for the heterogeneity of the upper part of the section in the processing and interpretation of seismic data [in Russian]. – INGG SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 2011.
13. Taner M.T., Koehler F. Surface consistent corrections // Geophysics. – 1981. – Vol. 46 (1). – P. 17–22, doi: 10.1190/1.1441133.
14. Taner M.T., Koehler F., Alhilali K.A. Estimation and correction of near-surface time anomalies // Geophysics. – 1974. – Vol. 39 (4). – P. 441–463, doi: 10.1190/1.1440441.
15. Wiggins R.A., Larner K.L., Wisecup R.D. Residual statics analysis as a general linear inverse problem // Geophysics. – 1976. – Vol. 41 (5). – P. 922–938, doi: 10.1190/1.1440672.
Review
For citations:
Kushnarev R.S., Goreiavchev N.A., Mitrofanov G.M. Testing the matrix implementation of the algorithm for surface-consistent compensation of seismic amplitudes. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies. 2021;(4):26-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2021-4-26
Views:
394
Email this article 