Approbation of seismic and electrical geophysical techniques complex for solving the permafrost monitoring problems on the pile-foundation building
https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2022-3-49
Abstract
In the urban conditions in Salekhard city, a complex of methods, including electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), ground penetrating radar (GPR), a seismic survey on refracted waves (REF), on surface waves (MASW) and the standing waves selection, was tested on solving geocryological problems and monitor the permafrost at the building base. As a model object, a residential building on a pile foundation, built according to the principle I and equipped with a continuous geothermal monitoring system, was chosen. It has been established that the ERT, REF, and MASW methods are ineffective in the conditions of a reinforced concrete pile foundation in a grillage and a concrete floor screed with a layer of loose bulk soil under it. The best result was shown by GPR at frequencies of 150 and 400 MHz and seismic exploration with the standing wave selection. A combination of these methods is recommended for determining the upper permafrost boundary under buildings, determining the actual piles-length, the quality of their fixing, assessing the water content of soils in the area around the piles, and establishing the residual building life.
About the Authors
A. A. ZaplavnovaTrofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District
Salekhard, Republic Str., 20, office 203, Tyumen Region, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, 629008
Russian Federation
V. V. Olenchenko
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
P. A. Dergach
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
K. V. Fedin
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
P. S. Osipova
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
A. N. Shein
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District
Salekhard, Republic Str., 20, office 203, Tyumen Region, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, 629008
Russian Federation
References
1. Auzin A.A., Zatzepin S.A. Determination of the geometric characteristics of pile structures by geophysical methods // Proceedings of the 43th session “Problems of Theory and Practice in Geological Interpretation of Geophysical Fields” [in Russian]. – Voronezh, Nauchnaya Kniga, 2016. – P. 24–27.
2. Auzin A.A. Survey of the foundations of engineering structures by geophysical methods // Proceedings of the 47th session “Problems of Theory and Practice in Geological Interpretation of Geophysical Fields” [in Russian]. – Voronezh, Nauchnaya Kniga, 2020. – P. 25–28.
3. Efremov V.N., Drozdov A.V. Changes in the geocryological state of bulk hydraulic structures in Western Yakutia and optimization of their monitoring by a complex of electrical exploration methods of geophysics // Natural Resources of the Arctic and Subarctic. – 2016. – Vol. 3 (83). – P. 36–42.
4. Kapustin V.V. Development of methods for complex geophysical studies of soils, geotechnical and building structures. PhD Thesis [in Russian]. – MGU, Moscow, 2008. – 26 p.
5. Kolesnikov Yu.I., Fedin K.V. Application of passive standing wave method in engineering seismics: physical modelling and field experiment // Seismic Technologies. – 2016. – Vol. 2. – P. 83–91.
6. Melnikov V.P., Skvortsov A.G., Malkova G.V., Drozdov D.S., Ponomareva O.E., Sadurtdinov M.R., Tsarev A.M., Dubrovin V.A. Results of studying the geocryological conditions of the Arctic territories using seismic methods // Russian Geology and Geophysics. – 2010. – Vol. 51 (1). – P. 136–142, doi: 10.1016/j.rgg.2009.12.011.
7. Rumyantsev A.A., Sergeevtsev E.Yu. Vibration tests of a 16-storey residential building of a volume-block design // Vestnik MGSU. – 2012. – Vol. 5. – P. 98–102.
8. Rychkov S.P. MSC.visual NASTRAN for Windows [in Russian]. – NT Press, Moscow, 2004. – 552 p.
9. Starovoitov A.V. Interpretation of georadar data // Exploration and protection of mineral resources. – 2008. – Vol. 12. – P. 46–48.
10. McDowell P.W., Barker R., Butcher A.P., Culshaw M.G., Jackson P.D., McCann D.M., Skip B.P., Matthews S.L., Arthur J.C.R. Geophysics in engineering investigations. – Ciria, London, 2002. – 266 p.
11. Serdyukov A.S., Yablokov A.V., Duchkov A.A., Azarov A.A., Baranov V.D. Slant f-k transform of multichannel seismic surface wave data // Geophysics. – 2019. – Vol. 84 (1) – P. 19–24, doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0430.1.
12. Yablokov A.V., Serdyukov A.S., Loginov G.N., Baranov V.D. An artificial neural network approach for the inversion of surface wave dispersion curves // Geophysical Prospecting. – 2021. – Vol. 69 (7). – P.1405–1432, doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13107.
13. Zykov Yu.D., Koshurnikov A.V., Pogorelov A.A., Sizykh E.M., Bek D.D., Usov A.M., Luchko M.V., Prosuntsov K.S., Skobelev A.D., Smagin M.K. Role and place of electromagnetic sounding in solving geocryological problems // Proceedings of the First International Scientific and Practical Conference “GeoBaikal 2010” [in Russian]. – Irkutsk, 2010. – 2 p.
Review
For citations:
Zaplavnova A.A., Olenchenko V.V., Dergach P.A., Fedin K.V., Osipova P.S., Shein A.N. Approbation of seismic and electrical geophysical techniques complex for solving the permafrost monitoring problems on the pile-foundation building. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies. 2022;(3):49-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2022-3-49