Methodology of physical models parameters determining for seismic experiments
https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2022-4-75
Abstract
The issues of choosing materials for creating physical models into seismic exploration are considered. The main attention is paid to the correspondence of the acoustic parameters of the materials used in the preparation of the model to the properties of the rocks of the real medium. A technique is proposed for measuring the attenuation coefficient in materials that serve as the main elements of the formed physical model.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Zadoev
http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/institute/staff/zadoevay
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
T. A. Petrochenko
Novosibirsk State Technical University
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
Yu. A. Orlov
http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/institute/staff/orlovya
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State University
Pirogova Str., 1, Novosibirsk, 630090
Russian Federation
A. A. Duchkov
http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/institute/staff/duchkovaa
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State Technical University
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State Technical University
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
G. M. Mitrofanov
http://www.ipgg.sbras.ru/ru/institute/staff/mitrofanovgm
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State Technical University
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS
Koptyug Ave., 3, Novosibirsk, 630090
Novosibirsk State Technical University
K. Marks Ave., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073
Russian Federation
References
1. Averko E.M., Maksimov L.A. Modeling of seismic fields and methods of their processing [in Russian]. – Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984. – 86 p.
2. Bloomfield P.E., Lo W.J., Lewin P.A. Experimental study of the acoustical properties of polymers utilized to construct PVDF ultrasonic transducers and the acousto-electric properties of PVDF and P (VDF/TrFE) films // IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectric, and Frequency Control. – 2000. – Vol. 47. – P. 1397–1405, doi: 10.1109/58.883528.
3. Bogoslovskii V.A., Gorbachev Yu.I., Zhigalin A.D., Kalinin A.V., Popov M.G., Pushkarev P.Yu., Modin I.N., Nikitin A.A., Nikitin An.A., Stepanov P.Yu., Hmelevskij V.K. Geophysics [in Russian]. – KDU, Dobrosvet, Moscow, 2018. – 320 p.
4. Brodovoi V.V., Glebovsky Yu.S., Dmitriev V.I., Dortman N.B., Zaporozhets V.M., Mudretsova E.A., Nikitin A.A., Nikitsky A.E., Nomokonov V.P., Dobrynina N.P., Pershina E.G. Physical properties of rocks and minerals. Handbook of geophysics [in Russian]. – Nedra, Moscow, 1988. – 455 p.
5. Brown R.J., Lawton D.C., Cheadle S.P. Scaled physical modelling of anisotropic wave propagation: multioffset profiles over an orthorhombic medium // Geophysical Journal International. – 1991. – Vol. 107 (3). – P. 693– 702, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01428.x.
6. Chang C.-H., Gardner G.H.F. Effects of vertically aligned subsurface fractures on seismic reflections: A physical model study // Geophysics. – 1997. – Vol. 62 (1). – P. 245–252, doi: 10.1190/1.1444124.
7. Chang C.-H., Gardner G.H., McDonald J.A. A physical model of shear-wave propagation in transversely isotropic solid // Geophysics. – 1994. – Vol. 59 (3). – P. 484–487, doi: 10.1190/1.1443610.
8. Dulaijan K.A., Margrave G.F., Wong J. 3D seismic physical modeling for azimuthal variations of P-wave velocity // CREWES Research Report. – 2015. – Vol. 27. – 13 p.
9. Ebrom D.A., McDonald J.A. Seismic physical modeling. Geophysics reprint series. No. 15. – Society of Exploration Geophysicists, South Yale, 1994. – 519 p.
10. Ermolov I.N., Vopilkin A.C., Badaluan V.G. Calculations in Ultrasonic Testing. – Echo, Moscow, 2004. – 109 p.
11. Evans B., McDonald J., French W. Seismic physical modelling of reservoirs, its past, present and future // ASEG Extended Abstracts. – 2007. – Vol. 2007 (1). – P. 1–6, doi: 10.1071/ASEG2007ab037.
12. French W.S. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional migration of model-experiment reflection profiles // Geophysics. – 1974. – Vol. 39 (3). – P. 265–277, doi: 10.1190/1.1440426.
13. Hilterman F.J. Three-dimensional seismic modeling // Geophysics. – 1970. – Vol. 35 (6). – P. 1020–1037, doi: 10.1190/1.1440140.
14. Ivakin B.N. Methods for modeling seismic wave phenomena [in Russian]. – Nauka, Moscow, 1969. – 287 p.
15. Popov D.A., Musin M.V., Polovkov V.V. Seismic physical modeling for consolidated crust studies // Geophysical methods of survey the Earth and its subsoil. – St. Petersburg, 2016. – P. 102–111.
16. Sherlock D., McKenna J., Evans B. Time-lapse 3-D seismic physical modelling // Exploration Geophysics. – 2000. – Vol. 31 (1–2). – P. 310–314, doi: 10.1071/EG00310.
17. Terada T., Tsuboi C. Experimental studies on elastic waves. Part 1 // Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute. – 1927. – Vol. 3. – P. 55–65.
18. Wang T., Yuan S., Shi P., Shuai D., Luo C., Wang S. AVAZ inversion for fracture weakness based on three-term Rüger equation // Journal of Applied Geophysics. – 2018. – Vol. 162. – P. 184–193, doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.12.013.
19. Wong J., Hall K., Gallant E., Maier R., Bertram M., Lawton D. Seismic physical modeling at the University of Calgary // SEG Technical Program/ Expanded Abstracts. – 2009. – P. 2642–2646, doi: 10.1190/1.3255395.
Review
For citations:
Zadoev A.Yu., Petrochenko T.A., Orlov Yu.A., Duchkov A.A., Mitrofanov G.M. Methodology of physical models parameters determining for seismic experiments. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies. 2022;(4):75-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18303/2619-1563-2022-4-75
Views:
173
Email this article 